SAT语法~有几个SAT的语法问题~()对应A B C D E 选项找错：A great gray owl （A）（fl

SAT语法~
有几个SAT的语法问题~
()对应A B C D E 选项
找错：A great gray owl （A）（flying low） across a forest clearing,its (B)（wings beating) quietly and its ultrasensitive ears turned to the (C)(faint sounds) made by small (D)(creatures concealed) under leaves.(E)(No erroes)
A是错的,但是我觉得B也是错的.既然主句在前面,为什么还出现后面its wings?
修改句子：A thick growth of sunflowers （standing ten feet tall,their brown heads drooped） over the fence with the weight of their seeds.
换成：（stood ten feet tall,teir brown heads drooping）
我觉得这句跟上面那句句式也是一样的~

1.问此类问题者英语水平已然不低.
2.两个问题同一性质、同一类型：独立主格结构.
(”觉得这句跟上面那句句式也是一样的"----感觉完全正确!)
3.”随心奔驰的马" 和 "理论工作" 的理解和解释完全正确,虽有一处欠准.
欠准之处："在第一个句子中,主语是A great gray owl,但.turned这.动作的发出
者.为ears“------实际应说成 "turned这一动作的接受者为ears",因为turned是
过去分词,在此表被动.)
4.你的句子所涉及的问题说来就是：
4.1 当现在分词表示的动作的执行者不是句子的主语,而是一个独立于句子主语的(也就是不同于句子主语的)逻辑上的主语时,就够成了含现在分词的独立主格结构.所谓的"独立",就是不同于句子主语.说"主格",是因为分词部分不是句子,故不是"主语".说"逻辑上的",是因为分词都是动词变来的,而动词表动作,而动作从逻辑上讲就应有执行者(有时是接受者--则表被动),这个执行者(或接受者)就是该动词的主语(逻辑上的)---这不是挺符合逻辑吗?
例子：
He sat in the chair,his hands resting on his lap.
分析：
resting on his lap 这一动作的执行者不是句子的主语 (he),而是独立于句子主语的(即不同于句子主语的) his hands.换言之,resting on his lap 这一动作的逻辑主语就是 his hands.
类比：
你问题中的 "beating quietly (轻轻煽动) "这一动作的具体执行者是 "its wings",不是句子的主语 "a great gray owl".第二句改为 "A thick growth of sunflowers stood ten feet tall,their brown heads drooping over the fence with the weight of their seeds.这里的 their brown heads 就是 drooping over the fence with the weight of theri seeds 的逻辑主语.
4-2 当过去分词所表示的动作的接受者(过去分词在独立主格结构中表示被动,被如何就意味着该动作有接受者)不是句子的主语,而是一个独立于句子主语的(也就是不同于句子主语的)逻辑上的主语时,就够成了另一形式的独立主格结构--含过去分词的独立主格结构."独立"、"主格"、"逻辑上的"含义同 4-1.
例子：
The elephant lay by the waterhole dead for a long time,its tusks sawed off.(大象躺在水坑边,早已死去,两颗象牙也已被锯.)
分析：
被锯掉的不是大象,而是他的牙(its tusks).
类比：
在 "its ultrasensitive ears turned to..."中,是 "its ultrasenstive ears" 被指向微弱的声音,而不是猫头鹰被指向微弱的声音,即 "turned to." 的逻辑主语不是句子的主语!
5.更多例子(带不带with无区别)：
a.They talked on the patio over their afternoon tea,(with) the dog lying beside.(-ing)
b..He was driving along SH16,(with) his right arm hanging outside the car door.(-ing) (他沿着
16号国道开行,右手臂垂在车窗外.)
c.He went out,(with) his head held high.(-ed)
d.The dog came in,(with) one of its hind legs bleeding and its tail seriously injured.(-ing)
-ed)
无"限制性独立主格结构"和"非限制性独立主格结构"之分.
再问： 这么说来我直接这样换，是否是一样的句子 A great gray owl flew low across a forest clearing, with its wings beating quietly and its ultrasensitive ears turned to the faint sounds made by small creatures concealed under leaves. （这样原句不就是一个省略了分句的with 的句子吗？我不太爱记一些复杂的专业词，但我还想问个问题。是不是凡是带with的这类分句都能省略with?）
再答： 1. A great gray owl flew low across a forest clearing, with its wings beating quietly and its ultrasensitive ears turned to the faint sounds made by small creatures concealed under leaves. 对，它是一个perfect and impeccable的句子。 2. 不太理解“这样原句不就是一个省略了分句的with 的句子吗？”------我理解你在说：把独立主 格结构中开头的 with 省略了。若我的理解对，答案是：是。 不知能否帮到你：A great gray owl flew low across a forest clearing；its wings beat quietly， and its ultrasensitive ears were turned to the faint sounds made by small creatures concealed under leaves. (三个完完整整的并列句。) 3. A thick growth of sunflowers stood ten feet tall, and their brown heads drooped over the fence with the weight of their seeds. = A thick growth of sunflowers stood ten feet tall, their brown heads drooping over the fence with the weight of their seeds. 4. "是不是凡是带with的这类分句都能省略with?"----虽然“凡是”有点吓人，但答案是 YES。依 感觉 (未统计！位核实！) 省略 with 的情况多些。