作业帮啊~~拜托翻译成中文 急用急用～!翻的好加分没话说~
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/06/05 06:34:03
啊~~拜托翻译成中文 急用急用～!翻的好加分没话说~
Versions in German, Portuguese, Hebrew, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese showed similar structures to the FFM. The median cross-language congruence coefficients were.96, .95, .94, .96 and .96 for Emorional Stability, Extriversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiouseness, respectively, and only 2 out of 105 coefficients failed reach.90, and both of those were .89. They concluded that there is evidence for a common human structure of personality based on the FFM.
with regard to its stability over time,longitudinal studies have shown that similar results for an individual are found on Big Five measures of personality throughout the life span. In a longitudinal study that followed 163 men for over 45 years, individuals were rated on personality traits at the end of their college careers and subsequently took the NEO-Personality Inventory at approximately ages 67-68 years of age. The college traits were transformed, via a rating procedure, to scales assessing each of the Big Five dimensions and related to the NEO-PI. Three traits: Neuroticism,外向型,和宽容型,exhibited significant correlations across the 45-year interval.Furthermore the trait profiles remained relatively stable over that interval. In a meta-analysis, Ardelt(2000) sought to assess the stability of personality of personality over time. It was found that studies assessing any of the "Big Five NEO"personality traits tended to find higher personality stability coefficients. In another study that sought to assess the stability of personality, measures of Big Five dimensions vs. traits were compared over a two-year period. Specifically, they retested on a Big Five personality measure and a trait inventory over a two and one half year period. Results provided clear evidence of differential stability: results on the trait measure were consistently less stable than the Big Five measure.
Costa and McCrae posit that personality is stable after the age of 30.This was supported by a 6-year longitudinal study that measured personality on the Big Five dimensions for individuals and their spouses. It was found that retest stability was quite high for all five dimensions in selfreports and for the three dimensions in spouse rating. they concluded that the data supported the position that personality is stable after age 30 based upon a Big Five measure.
With regard to occupational outcomes, personality traits are enduring predispositions that relate either directly to occupational outcomes or lead individuals to behave in certain ways or to seek out certain situations associated with occupational outcomes. Since the introduction and general acceptance of the FFM in the early 1990's, many researchers agree that these "broadly defined traits are better in predicting job performance as well as in explaining behaviors, than narrowly defind personality traits" and have shown them to be valid predictors of performance through over a decade of research in applied and academic settings.
Versions in German, Portuguese, Hebrew, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese showed similar structures to the FFM. The median cross-language congruence coefficients were.96, .95, .94, .96 and .96 for Emorional Stability, Extriversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiouseness, respectively, and only 2 out of 105 coefficients failed reach.90, and both of those were .89. They concluded that there is evidence for a common human structure of personality based on the FFM.
with regard to its stability over time,longitudinal studies have shown that similar results for an individual are found on Big Five measures of personality throughout the life span. In a longitudinal study that followed 163 men for over 45 years, individuals were rated on personality traits at the end of their college careers and subsequently took the NEO-Personality Inventory at approximately ages 67-68 years of age. The college traits were transformed, via a rating procedure, to scales assessing each of the Big Five dimensions and related to the NEO-PI. Three traits: Neuroticism,外向型,和宽容型,exhibited significant correlations across the 45-year interval.Furthermore the trait profiles remained relatively stable over that interval. In a meta-analysis, Ardelt(2000) sought to assess the stability of personality of personality over time. It was found that studies assessing any of the "Big Five NEO"personality traits tended to find higher personality stability coefficients. In another study that sought to assess the stability of personality, measures of Big Five dimensions vs. traits were compared over a two-year period. Specifically, they retested on a Big Five personality measure and a trait inventory over a two and one half year period. Results provided clear evidence of differential stability: results on the trait measure were consistently less stable than the Big Five measure.
Costa and McCrae posit that personality is stable after the age of 30.This was supported by a 6-year longitudinal study that measured personality on the Big Five dimensions for individuals and their spouses. It was found that retest stability was quite high for all five dimensions in selfreports and for the three dimensions in spouse rating. they concluded that the data supported the position that personality is stable after age 30 based upon a Big Five measure.
With regard to occupational outcomes, personality traits are enduring predispositions that relate either directly to occupational outcomes or lead individuals to behave in certain ways or to seek out certain situations associated with occupational outcomes. Since the introduction and general acceptance of the FFM in the early 1990's, many researchers agree that these "broadly defined traits are better in predicting job performance as well as in explaining behaviors, than narrowly defind personality traits" and have shown them to be valid predictors of performance through over a decade of research in applied and academic settings.
在德国,葡萄牙文,希伯来文,中文,韩文版本,和日本发现类似结构的实况调查团.中位数跨语言一致性系数were.96,0.95,0.94,0.96和Emorional稳定,Extriversion,开放性,宜人性和Conscientiouseness,分别只有2 0.96内未能通过105系数reach.90,和这两种说法都.89.他们认为,有一个共同的人的人格结构的证据的基础上,实况调查团.
就其稳定性随着时间的推移,纵向研究表明,对于一个人的大发现整个生命周期五人格措施类似的结果.在一项纵向研究,随后163 45岁以上的男子,个人被评为上的个性特征在他们的大学生涯结束,随后发生在大约年龄67-68岁的新人格问卷.该学院的特点,正在转化,通过评级的程序,以评估每一个规模大五维度和相关的新皮.三个特点：神经质,外向型,和宽容型,表现出跨越45年interval.Furthermore的特征显着相关性配置保持相对稳定的区间.在一个荟萃分析,Ardelt（2000）设法评估在一段时间内稳定的人格个性.结果发现,研究,评估“五大近地天体”人格特质倾向于寻找稳定系数较高的个性.在另一项旨在评估个性稳定,大五方面的措施与特点进行了比较研究,超过两年.具体而言,他们重新测试在大五人格措施,是在两年一特质清单一年半时间.结果提供了明确的证据微分稳定性：在特征测量结果始终低于五大措施稳定.
哥斯达黎加和麦克雷posit的个性后30.This年龄稳定表示支持6年纵向研究,衡量五大个人及其配偶方面的个性.结果发现,复测稳定性相当高,在selfreports的所有五个方面和在配偶评价的三个方面.他们的结论是,数据支持的立场,个性是后一后五大措施的30岁稳定.
关于职业的成果,个性是持久的易患病体质是直接向有关职业成果或个人的行为导致某种方式,或寻求与职业有关的某些情况下的结果.由于引进和在90年代初,许多研究者都认为,这些广义的“特质,在预测工作绩效,以及在解释行为的更好的,不是狭隘defind个性特征”,并表明,它们是有效的预测普遍接受调查团业绩,超过10年的研究在应用和学术环境.
就其稳定性随着时间的推移,纵向研究表明,对于一个人的大发现整个生命周期五人格措施类似的结果.在一项纵向研究,随后163 45岁以上的男子,个人被评为上的个性特征在他们的大学生涯结束,随后发生在大约年龄67-68岁的新人格问卷.该学院的特点,正在转化,通过评级的程序,以评估每一个规模大五维度和相关的新皮.三个特点：神经质,外向型,和宽容型,表现出跨越45年interval.Furthermore的特征显着相关性配置保持相对稳定的区间.在一个荟萃分析,Ardelt（2000）设法评估在一段时间内稳定的人格个性.结果发现,研究,评估“五大近地天体”人格特质倾向于寻找稳定系数较高的个性.在另一项旨在评估个性稳定,大五方面的措施与特点进行了比较研究,超过两年.具体而言,他们重新测试在大五人格措施,是在两年一特质清单一年半时间.结果提供了明确的证据微分稳定性：在特征测量结果始终低于五大措施稳定.
哥斯达黎加和麦克雷posit的个性后30.This年龄稳定表示支持6年纵向研究,衡量五大个人及其配偶方面的个性.结果发现,复测稳定性相当高,在selfreports的所有五个方面和在配偶评价的三个方面.他们的结论是,数据支持的立场,个性是后一后五大措施的30岁稳定.
关于职业的成果,个性是持久的易患病体质是直接向有关职业成果或个人的行为导致某种方式,或寻求与职业有关的某些情况下的结果.由于引进和在90年代初,许多研究者都认为,这些广义的“特质,在预测工作绩效,以及在解释行为的更好的,不是狭隘defind个性特征”,并表明,它们是有效的预测普遍接受调查团业绩,超过10年的研究在应用和学术环境.