英语翻译自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,我国《公司法》于1993年颁

英语翻译
自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,
我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权做出规定.然而公司出现僵局,大股东滥用资本,股东利益持续受损而无法解除等情况时常出现.中小股东的利益受到严重侵害时,由于立法的空白,导致中小股东权利不能得到救济.2006年起实施的新《公司法》第183条规定：“公司经营管理发生严重困难,继续存续会使股东利益受到重大损失,通过其他途径不能解决的,持有公司全部股东表决权百分之十以上的股东,可以请求人民法院解散公司.”这一规定首次确定了我国股东解散公司的诉权,为中小股东的权利保护提供了法律依据,是我国公司法立法上的重大突破.然而,这一规定显得原则化了,在实际司法操作中会遇到很多问题.比如：立案审查的条件,当事人诉讼主体资格的确认,公司经营管理发生严重困难的认定等.本文以解散公司诉权在司法实践中存在的问题以及立法完善为中心,在研究股东解散公司诉权时,分析我国立法状况,借鉴国外股东解散公司诉权保护的规定及实践,对我国解散公司诉权的问题进行探讨,以期为司法实践提供点参考.
使用在线翻译的朋友请绕开！

我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权做出规定.然而公司出现僵局,大股东滥用资本,股东利益持续受损而无法解除等情况时常出现.中小股东中小股东的利益受到严重侵害时,由于立法的空白,导致中小股东权利不能得到救济
Our country’s ‘Company Act’ was promulgated in 1993,but at that time,due to historical and practical reasons,it did not specify the petition rights of shareholders to dissolve a company.So the incidents of companies reaching impasse,major shareholders abusing the use of capitals and shareholders’ interests suffering continuous losses had happened from time to time.When the interests of small and medium shareholders had sustained grave losses,they had no place to seek redress due to the lack of protective legislations.
2006年起实施的新《公司法》第183条规定：“公司经营管理发生严重困难,继续存续会使股东利益受到重大损失,通过其他途径不能解决的,持有公司全部股东表决权百分之十以上的股东,可以请求人民法院解散公司.”这一规定首次确定了我国股东解散公司的诉权,为中小股东的权利保护提供了法律依据,是我国公司法立法上的重大突破.然而,这一规定显得原则化了,在实际司法操作中会遇到很多问题.比如：立案审查的条件,当事人诉讼主体资格的确认,公司经营管理发生严重困难的认定等.
Clause 138 of the new ‘Company Act’ enacted in 2006 stipulates:‘In the event of the operating management of a company is suffering from serious difficulties,the continuous maintenance of its exixstence will incur heavy losses to the shareholders and all solution avenues had been exhausted,the shareholders holding more than 10% of the company’s total voting shares can petition for the dissolution of the company in a people’s court.’.This regulation for the first time ensures the petition rights of shareholders in our country to disolve a company,it offers legislative authority for the protection of the rights of small and medium shareholders and this is a breakthrough on the legislations of our country’s ‘Company Act’.However,this regulation appears to be in principle only,it will encounter many problems in actual judiciary operating procedures.For examples,the conditions required to place the case on file,the recognition on the qualification of the litigants,the determination on the existence of serious difficulties in the operating management of the company,etc.
本文以解散公司诉权在司法实践中存在的问题以及立法完善为中心,在研究股东解散公司诉权时,分析我国立法状况,借鉴国外股东解散公司诉权保护的规定及实践,对我国解散公司诉权的问题进行探讨,以期为司法实践提供点参考.
This thesis analyses the legislation situation in our country by attaching its emphasis on the existing problems in juridical practice during litigation of a company dissolution,and by referring to the regulations and actual applications from abroad in the protection of shareholders’ petition rights to dissolve a company in our country,it discusses the relevant problems with the objective of offering some references to juridical practice.