心理学英语翻译As we will see, the available evidence suggests inhib

心理学英语翻译
As we will see, the available evidence suggests inhibition,
or at least competition, between medial temporal lobebased
declarative memory and striatal-based procedural memory.
Even so, this evidence all comes either from animal studies that
used lesions or pharmacological intervention or else from human
neuroimaging studies that reported negative correlations between
medial temporal lobe and striatal activation in memory-dependent
tasks. To our knowledge there is little or no human behavioral evidence
of such interactions.
This article reports the results of two experiments that were designed
to investigate this issue. Both experiments used a hybrid
category-learning task in which perfect accuracy could be achieved
if a declarative strategy is used on some trials and a procedural
strategy is used on others. Of the 53 participants in the two experiments
who tried to learn these categories, only 2 appeared to use a
strategy of the optimal type. The responses of all other participants
were consistent with the perseverative use of a single memory system
throughout the experiment. These results run counter to the
predictions of existing single-system theories of category learning
and to the predictions of multiple systems theories that assume
independent learning in the two systems. To our knowledge, they
are the first human behavioral data to support the inhibition suggested
by the previous neuroscience research.
For a variety of reasons, we chose a perceptual category-learning
task for our behavioral paradigm. First, during the past decade
or so, many studies have reported evidence that human categorization
is mediated by a number of functionally distinct categorylearning
systems. The evidence suggests that these different systems
are each best suited for learning different types of category
structures, and are each mediated by different neural circuits
(e.g., Ashby, Alfonso-Reese, Turken, & Waldron, 1998; Erickson &
Kruschke, 1998; Love, Medin, & Gureckis, 2004; Reber, Gitelman,
Parrish, & Mesulam, 2003). Second, there is evidence that these different
category-learning systems map directly onto the major
memory systems that have been proposed (Ashby & O’Brien,
2005). Third, much of the neuroimaging data that supports inhibition
between declarative and procedural memory systems used a
category-learning paradigm. In particular, a number of fMRI studies
have reported an antagonistic relationship between neural activation
in the striatum and medial temporal lobes during category
learning – that is, striatal activation tended to increase with category
learning, whereas medial temporal lobe activation decreased
麻烦英语好的帮下忙.感激不尽.翻译得好可以追加

正如我们将会看到,现有的证据显示抑制作用,至少竞争,内侧颞lobebased之间的陈述性记忆和纹状体的程序内存.即便如此,这方面的证据都来自人类或动物研究从病变或药物干预,否则即使用神经影像学研究,报道相关任务之间的负相关,内侧颞内存叶及纹状体活化的影响.据我们所知,很少或没有人的这种互动行为的证据.本文报告此问题的调查结果两个实验,旨在.两个实验用混合类别的学习任务,经过精确度可以达到其他战略如果声明是用在一些试验和使用的策略是一个程序.在学习这些类别的53名与会者在两个实验谁尝试,似乎只有2使用类型战略的最佳选择.其他与会者的响应都是符合整个实验的固执使用一个单一的存储系统.这些结果违背类别学习的预测现有单一的,理论体系和两名系统的多系统理论预测的假设自主学习研究.据我们所知,他们是第一个人类行为数据,以支持其抑制由以前的研究表明神经科学的原因.对于一个品种,我们选择了我们的行为模式任务知觉类别的学习.第一,在过去十多年来,许多研究报告证明,人类的分类是一个系统介导的功能数量明显categorylearning.有证据表明,这些不同的系统是最适合每个类别结构类型的学习不同,1998年是每个介导的沃尔德伦,不同的神经回路（例如,阿什比,阿方里斯,特肯,＆;埃里克森和克鲁施克,1998年;爱,梅迪和Gureckis,2004年;雷伯,吉特尔曼,帕里什和梅舒拉姆,2003）.第二,有证据表明,这些不同类别的学习系统地图）直接到2005年的主要存储系统已提出（阿什比和奥布莱恩.第三,系统大部分的影像学资料,内存支持抑制声明和程序之间使用的类别学习的典范.特别是,一些研究报告的功能磁共振成像有一个类别的学习和内侧纹状体神经元之间的敌对关系,活化在颞叶中-也就是说,纹状体活化增加的趋势,学习类,而内侧颞叶激活下降