differences between continental law system and commom law sy
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/05/11 03:15:04
differences between continental law system and commom law system
不是要翻译
是回答这个问题
谢谢
不是要翻译
是回答这个问题
谢谢
The terms common law system and civil law system are used to distinguish two distinct legal systems and approaches to law.The use of the term ‘common law’ in this context refers to all those legal systems which have adopted the historic English legal system.Foremost amongst these is,of course,the United States,but many other Commonwealth and former Commonwealth countries retain a common law system.The term ‘civil law’ refers to those other jurisdictions which have adopted the European continental system of law derived essentially from ancient Roman law,but owing much to the Germanic tradition.
The usual distinction to be made between the two systems is that the common law system tends to be case-centred and hence judge-centred,allowing scope for a discretionary,pragmatic approach to the particular problems that appear before the courts.The law can be developed on a case-by-case basis.On the other hand,the civil law system tends to be a codified body of general abstract principles which control the exercise of judicial discretion.In reality,both these views are extremes,with the former overemphasising the extent to which the common law judges can impose their discretion and the latter underestimating the extent to which civil law judges have the power to exercise judicial discretion.It is perhaps worth mentioning at this point that the European Court of Justice,established,in theory,on civil law principles,is,in practice,increasingly recognising the benefits of establishing a body of case law.Although the European Court of Justice is not bound by the operation of the doctrine of stare decisis,it still does not decide individual cases on an individual basis without reference to its previous decisions.
The usual distinction to be made between the two systems is that the common law system tends to be case-centred and hence judge-centred,allowing scope for a discretionary,pragmatic approach to the particular problems that appear before the courts.The law can be developed on a case-by-case basis.On the other hand,the civil law system tends to be a codified body of general abstract principles which control the exercise of judicial discretion.In reality,both these views are extremes,with the former overemphasising the extent to which the common law judges can impose their discretion and the latter underestimating the extent to which civil law judges have the power to exercise judicial discretion.It is perhaps worth mentioning at this point that the European Court of Justice,established,in theory,on civil law principles,is,in practice,increasingly recognising the benefits of establishing a body of case law.Although the European Court of Justice is not bound by the operation of the doctrine of stare decisis,it still does not decide individual cases on an individual basis without reference to its previous decisions.
differences between continental law system and commom law sy
ifference between civil law system and common law system
common law system and civil law system
我想要CONTINENTAL LAW SYSTEM 的程序及特征 (用英语回答)
history about the common law system and the civil law system
我要找英语版本的关于CONTINENTAL LAW SYSTEM 的介绍,以及它在实行中的具体举措
英语翻译Development and Theory :The Anglo-American system of law
英语翻译有两种译法:Law is an art between just and good,Law is a fair
Discuss the relationship between ethics and law in negotiati
brown and law是什么意思
law and economics
j.law and kirio