作业帮法律专业英语,汉译英,
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/04/30 05:43:21
法律专业英语,汉译英,
在仲裁实践中,存在大量涉及第三人的案件,使得仲裁第三人成为一个不容回避的重要问题.第三人对争议案件事实的认定往往有着举足轻重的作用.我国1995年颁布的《仲裁法》中并没有规定仲裁第三人制度,其他关于仲裁的法律法规也没有明文规定.这样就造成了第三人被排除于程序之外.这不仅不利于案件全面、彻底的审查,纠纷的快速解决,而且对当事人之间争议的权利义务、整个案件的公平正义也是极为不利的.是否引入仲裁第三人,以及如何建立这一制度,在学术界引起了热烈的探讨.但目前持肯定观点的学者对于仲裁第三人法律制度的法理基础、具体程序构建等问题仍未达成共识.这就对仲裁第三人制度从理论层面上升至法律规定造成了困难.本文拟采用比较的方法,根据国内外的立法动向,从法理基础谈起,力图构建一个具体的规则设置,使得仲裁第三人制度在实践中得以操作.除去引言与结语,本文将分如下四个部分论述：
第一部分,关于仲裁第三人制度的概述.主要介绍仲裁第三人的基本概念及相关学说.通说认为仲裁第三人是对当事人之间争议的标的有独立的请求权或者虽无独立请求权但是与仲裁结果有法律上的利害关系因而参加到他人之间已经开始的仲裁程序中的人.本文将通过与民事诉讼第三人制度的比较,对这一概念进行评析,力图在考量仲裁自身特征的前提下提出有仲裁特色的仲裁第三人概念.
第二部分,仲裁第三人制度之理论基础.反对设立仲裁第三人制度的主要理论是,如果允许非原仲裁协议的当事人参与一个已经开始的仲裁程序,已然与当事人意思自治的原则形成了矛盾.本部分将从当事人意思自治、权益救济机制、仲裁协议效力的扩张等理论出发,论证设立仲裁第三人制度的必要性与可行性,对具体构建该制度提供理论支持.
第三部分,国内外关于仲裁第三人制度的立法与实践.大陆法系国家中的荷兰、比利时和法国,英美法系国家中的美国和英国,以及国际仲裁机构的仲裁规则,都对仲裁第三人制度进行过相关规定.在这一部分将对这些规定加以分析、评价,找出在我国设立仲裁第三人制度可借鉴之处.
第四部分,设立仲裁第三人制度的具体构想.我国虽然未在立法中明确规定仲裁第三人制度,但国内有些仲裁委员会曾做出尝试,在其规定的仲裁规则中规定第三人可以参加仲裁（如：重庆、贵阳）.笔者认为我国需要在立法上对仲裁第三人作出明确的规定,以使仲裁制度更趋完善.在仲裁第三人制度的程序设置方面,首先确定仲裁第三人参加仲裁程序的方式、时间和条件；其次明确仲裁第三人在仲裁中的权利及相应限制.
[关键词] 仲裁第三人 法理分析 制度构建
在仲裁实践中,存在大量涉及第三人的案件,使得仲裁第三人成为一个不容回避的重要问题.第三人对争议案件事实的认定往往有着举足轻重的作用.我国1995年颁布的《仲裁法》中并没有规定仲裁第三人制度,其他关于仲裁的法律法规也没有明文规定.这样就造成了第三人被排除于程序之外.这不仅不利于案件全面、彻底的审查,纠纷的快速解决,而且对当事人之间争议的权利义务、整个案件的公平正义也是极为不利的.是否引入仲裁第三人,以及如何建立这一制度,在学术界引起了热烈的探讨.但目前持肯定观点的学者对于仲裁第三人法律制度的法理基础、具体程序构建等问题仍未达成共识.这就对仲裁第三人制度从理论层面上升至法律规定造成了困难.本文拟采用比较的方法,根据国内外的立法动向,从法理基础谈起,力图构建一个具体的规则设置,使得仲裁第三人制度在实践中得以操作.除去引言与结语,本文将分如下四个部分论述：
第一部分,关于仲裁第三人制度的概述.主要介绍仲裁第三人的基本概念及相关学说.通说认为仲裁第三人是对当事人之间争议的标的有独立的请求权或者虽无独立请求权但是与仲裁结果有法律上的利害关系因而参加到他人之间已经开始的仲裁程序中的人.本文将通过与民事诉讼第三人制度的比较,对这一概念进行评析,力图在考量仲裁自身特征的前提下提出有仲裁特色的仲裁第三人概念.
第二部分,仲裁第三人制度之理论基础.反对设立仲裁第三人制度的主要理论是,如果允许非原仲裁协议的当事人参与一个已经开始的仲裁程序,已然与当事人意思自治的原则形成了矛盾.本部分将从当事人意思自治、权益救济机制、仲裁协议效力的扩张等理论出发,论证设立仲裁第三人制度的必要性与可行性,对具体构建该制度提供理论支持.
第三部分,国内外关于仲裁第三人制度的立法与实践.大陆法系国家中的荷兰、比利时和法国,英美法系国家中的美国和英国,以及国际仲裁机构的仲裁规则,都对仲裁第三人制度进行过相关规定.在这一部分将对这些规定加以分析、评价,找出在我国设立仲裁第三人制度可借鉴之处.
第四部分,设立仲裁第三人制度的具体构想.我国虽然未在立法中明确规定仲裁第三人制度,但国内有些仲裁委员会曾做出尝试,在其规定的仲裁规则中规定第三人可以参加仲裁（如：重庆、贵阳）.笔者认为我国需要在立法上对仲裁第三人作出明确的规定,以使仲裁制度更趋完善.在仲裁第三人制度的程序设置方面,首先确定仲裁第三人参加仲裁程序的方式、时间和条件；其次明确仲裁第三人在仲裁中的权利及相应限制.
[关键词] 仲裁第三人 法理分析 制度构建
看看合适吗
In arbitration practice, the presence of a third party cases involving third, make arbitration becomes an assignable important problem. Third party to dispute the facts of the case that often has a pivotal role. Promulgated by the China 1995 arbitration law did not stipulated that arbitration regarding arbitration, other such system of laws and regulations also not well documented. Such third party has caused by exclude from program besides. This not only against case comprehensive and thorough review, disputes, and solving fast on the parties of the dispute between rights and duties, the whole case of fairness and justice is also extremely adverse. Third party, whether and how to introduce arbitration, establish this system in academia aroused a heated discussion. But currently held positive views of scholars for the arbitration legal system of third party legal basis, specific procedures construction problems have not reached a consensus. The third person to arbitration from theoretical system of rose to law caused difficulties. This paper adopts comparative method, according to the domestic and foreign legislation trend, from legal basis to construct a concrete mentioned, the arbitration rules set up, making such system in practice to operate. Remove quotes and epilogue, this paper will be divided into four parts to discuss:
The first part, such system overview of arbitration. Mainly introduces the basic concept and the arbitration third related theories. The third person to say think arbitration is the dispute between the parties mark have independent claim or have no independent claim with arbitration results have laws but the interest relationship thus join others have begun to the arbitration procedure between the people. This paper will such system with civil lawsuit compared with this concept, and tries to analyzes the consideration the premise of arbitration characteristics forward third characteristic of arbitration has arbitration concept.
The second part of such system, arbitration theoretical basis. Against such system establishment arbitration main theory is, if allow the original arbitration agreement the parties involved in a has started the arbitration procedure, already and the principle of party autonomy formed contradictions. This section will from party autonomy, rights relief mechanism, the effectiveness of arbitration agreement expansion theory, establish the arbitration such system demonstrated the necessity and feasibility of constructing the system of concrete, provide theoretical support.
The third part, such system at home and abroad about arbitration legislation and practice. Continental law system country of Holland, Belgium and France, countries of Anglo-American law system of the United States and Britain, and international arbitration institution for arbitration, the arbitration rules in a related provisions such system. In this part of these provisions will be to analyze, evaluate, and find out such system established in China arbitration can be used for reference.
The fourth part, set up such system concrete Suggestions to arbitration. Although China has not been clearly stipulated that arbitration legislation in such system, but in China, some arbitration commission has tried, in its provisions prescribed in the rules of arbitration of the third party may attend arbitration (such as: chongqing, guiyang). The author thinks that the country needs to arbitration in legislation, third party clearly defined, in order to make the arbitration system is more perfect. Such system in the arbitration application Settings, first set of arbitration third party in the arbitration procedure way, time and conditions; Second clear in the third party rights arbitration arbitration and the corresponding restriction.
[key words] arbitration legal system construction, third analysis
In arbitration practice, the presence of a third party cases involving third, make arbitration becomes an assignable important problem. Third party to dispute the facts of the case that often has a pivotal role. Promulgated by the China 1995 arbitration law did not stipulated that arbitration regarding arbitration, other such system of laws and regulations also not well documented. Such third party has caused by exclude from program besides. This not only against case comprehensive and thorough review, disputes, and solving fast on the parties of the dispute between rights and duties, the whole case of fairness and justice is also extremely adverse. Third party, whether and how to introduce arbitration, establish this system in academia aroused a heated discussion. But currently held positive views of scholars for the arbitration legal system of third party legal basis, specific procedures construction problems have not reached a consensus. The third person to arbitration from theoretical system of rose to law caused difficulties. This paper adopts comparative method, according to the domestic and foreign legislation trend, from legal basis to construct a concrete mentioned, the arbitration rules set up, making such system in practice to operate. Remove quotes and epilogue, this paper will be divided into four parts to discuss:
The first part, such system overview of arbitration. Mainly introduces the basic concept and the arbitration third related theories. The third person to say think arbitration is the dispute between the parties mark have independent claim or have no independent claim with arbitration results have laws but the interest relationship thus join others have begun to the arbitration procedure between the people. This paper will such system with civil lawsuit compared with this concept, and tries to analyzes the consideration the premise of arbitration characteristics forward third characteristic of arbitration has arbitration concept.
The second part of such system, arbitration theoretical basis. Against such system establishment arbitration main theory is, if allow the original arbitration agreement the parties involved in a has started the arbitration procedure, already and the principle of party autonomy formed contradictions. This section will from party autonomy, rights relief mechanism, the effectiveness of arbitration agreement expansion theory, establish the arbitration such system demonstrated the necessity and feasibility of constructing the system of concrete, provide theoretical support.
The third part, such system at home and abroad about arbitration legislation and practice. Continental law system country of Holland, Belgium and France, countries of Anglo-American law system of the United States and Britain, and international arbitration institution for arbitration, the arbitration rules in a related provisions such system. In this part of these provisions will be to analyze, evaluate, and find out such system established in China arbitration can be used for reference.
The fourth part, set up such system concrete Suggestions to arbitration. Although China has not been clearly stipulated that arbitration legislation in such system, but in China, some arbitration commission has tried, in its provisions prescribed in the rules of arbitration of the third party may attend arbitration (such as: chongqing, guiyang). The author thinks that the country needs to arbitration in legislation, third party clearly defined, in order to make the arbitration system is more perfect. Such system in the arbitration application Settings, first set of arbitration third party in the arbitration procedure way, time and conditions; Second clear in the third party rights arbitration arbitration and the corresponding restriction.
[key words] arbitration legal system construction, third analysis