英文翻译!不要用谷歌,要人工的~谢谢了

英文翻译!不要用谷歌,要人工的~谢谢了
This article pays particular attention to the theory of ‘globalisation as hybridisation’ put forward by sociology scholar Jan Nederveen Pieterse. His theory
argues that cultural globalisation does not simply involve a dominant culture infiltrating weaker others, but is rather a series of processes that involve cultural hybridisation.Similarly, sociologist Roland Robertson articulates the theory of ‘glocalisation’, stating that globalisation of culture does not necessarily lead to the homogenisation of (and by implication destruction of) local cultures. This is because the processes of global homogenisation and heterogenisation are ‘mutually implicative’1 because local is defined by global, and ‘when one considers them closely, they each have a local, diversifying aspect’.2 Robertson’s argument rejects the notion that globalisation is merely cultural homogenisation, and indicates instead practices of cultural interaction, interface and appropriation, which take place when a cultural form is accepted and then indigenised in another culture. Social-cultural anthropologist Arjun Appadurai reinforces this idea,arguing that ‘at least as rapidly as forces from various metropolises are brought into new societies they tend to become indigenized in one or another way’.3 In this sense, he contends that when a culture becomes transnational, the process of localisation is likely to be involved. This process makes the transnational culture become more complex than a uniform, global culture.

本文将特别注意所提出的社会学学者提出一月Nederveen Pieterse作为杂交全球化的理论.他的理论
认为,文化全球化并不仅仅涉及一人主导文化渗透弱,而是一种文化的过程,涉及一系列hybridisation.Similarly,社会学家罗兰罗伯逊阐明的'glocalisation的理论,指出文化全球化并不一定导致在均质（并暗示销毁）地方文化.这是因为全球均质和heterogenisation的过程是'相互implicative'1因为当地是全球定义,'当你考虑他们密切合作,它们都有一个地方,多样化方面,0.2罗伯逊的说法拒绝全球化的概念,只是文化均质化,并指出文化互动,接口和分配,该发生的文化形式时,被接受,然后在另一种文化indigenised而不是惯例.社会文化人类学家阿君阿帕杜莱加强了这一想法,认为作为新社会带来的是到各大都市的力量,至少他们往往迅速成为本土化的一种或另一种方式',在这个意义上说.3,他争辩说,当一种文化成为跨国公司,本地化的过程很可能会涉及.此过程使跨国文化变得比一个统一的,全球文化更加复杂.