英语翻译求下面这段外文的中文翻译In today’s political climate,anycase for pro

英语翻译
求下面这段外文的中文翻译
In today’s political climate,anycase for protecting jobs and industries in the United States will get a hearing,particularly when China is involved.The danger is that the U.S.government’s unilateral and narrow approach to protection solutions may have unintended consequences for both U.S.industries and consumers.
The current shrimp antidumping case,for example,may make China an even more competitive shrimp exporter,while doing nothing to increase competitiveness,productivity,growth,or jobs in the U.S.shrimp industry.
The Problem
On July 6,the U.S.Department of Commerce (DOC) announced preliminary import tariff determinations for China with margins ranging 0-112.81%.The wide range in tariffs is the first indication that something may be amiss with the analytical model used to determine “damage.” Processors sourcing from the same production area have received widely varying tariffs,despite facing the same costs for raw material.
What is the basis for the tariff determinations?For China,DOC uses a surrogate country – in this case India– to determine costs of production,rather than analyzing the actual costs faced by producers in China.This practice is based on the argument that since China is a “nonmarket economy,” its industry benefits from hidden government subsidies that cannot be quantified,but reduce costs and allow producers to compete unfairly.
Based on this approach,it is almost impossible to determine whether shrimp are exported to the U.S.below the domestic Chinese market price.There is a wide margin for interpretation by trade officials about what
constitutes damage.Is it possible to determine the real costs of production in nonmarket economies?The unequivocal answer is yes.The World Bank,which has operated in China since the late 1970s,has developed a methodology for analyzing production costs based on extensive knowledge of the sector,and national and local economic policies.There is no apparent reason why this model could not be used for analysis.

在今天的政治气候下,anycase保护工作和行业在美国将会得到一个听证会上,特别是在中国.危险是美国政府单方面和狭窄的方法来保护解决方案可能会带来意想不到的后果,消费者对于美国的工业.
当前的虾反倾销案为例,可能使中国的出口,而更有竞争力的虾无所事事以增加竞争力、生产率、生长、或工作在美国虾行业.
这个问题,
7月6日,美国商务部宣布,中国的进口关税初步裁定0-112.81%由于不等.更大范围的关税首先暗示某事可能会错与解析模型,用于确定.”“伤害源自同一生产的微处理器区域收到不同的关税,尽管面临同样的成本为原料.
什么是依据收录的关税吗?对于中国来说,医生使用一种替代的国家——在这种情况下,印度-确定生产成本,而不是对所面临的实际成本的生产厂家.这种做法是基于这样的论点,由于中国是一个“nonmarket”,其工业经济利益从隐藏的政府补贴,不能被量化,但降低成本,从而使生产者竞争不公平地.
基于此方法,它是几乎不可能确定虾销往美国市场的价格低于国内的中国人.有一个广泛的幅度由贸易官员解释什么
构成伤害.是否有可能确定真正的生产成本nonmarket经济体吗?在明确的答案是肯定的.世界银行的统计,中国已经在上世纪70年代末以来,已经开发出一种方法分析的基础上对生产成本的领域,丰富的知识和民族的和地方的经济政策.并没有明显的原因,该模型不能被用于分析
如果还有需要也可以来找我~