英语翻译Another possible avenue for future inquiry may involve i

英语翻译
Another possible avenue for future inquiry may involve identifying
other types of hostile cognition that play a role in promoting
aggression following social exclusion.We found evidence of partial
mediation in Experiment 3,which by definition indicates that
other processes were involved in fostering aggressive responses to
social exclusion.Also,we found no evidence that hostile cognition
mediated the rejection–aggression link when the hostile cognition
was not directed toward the target of aggression (Experiment 4).
The current investigation measured accessibility of hostile cognition
(Experiment 1a) and hostile attribution bias (Experiments
1b–4),but it is possible that other types of hostile cognition may
have impacted the aggression we observed.One possibility is that
social exclusion primes aggressive behavioral scripts.Scripts refer
to concepts stored in memory that guide actions,plans,and social
interactions (Schank & Abelson,1977).Social exclusion and aggressive
behavioral scripts may be closely linked in memory,
which would give rise to aggression when people experience social
exclusion.
Concluding Remarks
The current investigation sought to resolve the paradox of why
socially excluded people behave aggressively.Although one might
expect (and hope) that social exclusion would promote desirable
and prosocial responses,an abundance of evidence suggests that
social exclusion frequently results in aggression.Explanations
based on motivational or emotional processes have been consistently
discredited.Psychologists have therefore been left wondering
what,if any,process may help to explain the link between
social exclusion and aggression.
The current findings may offer a first step in resolving the
mystery of processes that promote aggression following social
exclusion:Excluded people see the world through blood-colored
glasses.Socially excluded people find words related to violence
and aggression easily accessible and perceive others as antagonistic
and hostile.Moreover,the activation of hostile cognition is
directly related to the aggression that is so often observed in people
who have been rejected.Though it is potentially disturbing to
observe the relative ease with which rejected participants in our
studies abandoned their normal inclination toward cooperative and
prosocial behaviors,it is also encouraging to understand one
reason why they became aggressive.It is our hope that the present
findings lead to a better understanding of why rejection causes
aggression and what measures can be taken to prevent such
unwanted
and harmful behavior.

未来调查的另一个可能的途径可能涉及敌对认知确定其他类型的发挥促进作用侵略后的社会排斥.我们发现在实验3,部分中介所定义的证据表明,其他进程是积极促进社会排斥反应有关.此外,我们没有发现任何证据表明,敌对认知介导的排斥,侵略链接时的敌对认知是不是对侵略（实验4）目标指示.目前的调查实测敌对认知无障碍（实验1a）和敌意归因偏差（实验1b中- 4）,但它有可能对其他类型的敌对认识可能影响我们观察的侵略.一种可能性是,社会排斥的素数的侵略行为脚本.脚本是指在内存中存储的概念,指导行动,计划和社会交往（杉克和阿拜尔森,1977）.社会排斥和侵略行为脚本可能在内存密切相关,这将引起人们的侵略经验的社会排斥.结束语目前的调查试图解决一个问题：为什么社会排斥的人的行为积极的矛盾.虽然人们可能期望（希望）,社会排斥将促进可取的和亲社会的反应,大量的证据表明,社会排斥经常侵略的结果.动机或情感上的解释过程中一直受到质疑.因此,心理学家一直在疑惑,如果有的话,进程可能有助于解释之间的社会排斥和侵略的联系.这一发现可能提供了解决的进程,促进侵略神秘以下社会排斥：社会排斥的人看世界的第一步通过血液,有色眼镜.社会排斥的人找到相关的暴力和侵略方便的话和别人看成是对立和敌视.此外,敌对认知激活直接关系到是谁经常在被拒绝的人观察到的侵略.虽然有潜在的不安,观察相对容易拒绝与其在我们的研究参与者放弃对亲社会行为的合作和正常的倾向,也是令人鼓舞的原因之一了解他们成为积极的.我们希望,目前的调查结果导致更好地理解为什么拒绝的原因侵略和有什么办法可以采取的防止不必要的和有害的行为.