英语翻译As for spam,ISPs (including mail service providers) coul

英语翻译
As for spam,ISPs (including mail service providers) could limit their users to,say,100 emails a day.For more,you would have to pay or at least post a security bond,or pass some good behavior test.At the same time,all ISPs should implement an email ID system (there are two good standards,called Domain Keys and SPF).This is not to track everyone's mail.ISPs would throttle traffic from ISPs that did not join the security collective,and pretty soon their customers would complain,forcing them either to join or find themselves relegated to the underworld,from which it would be hard to launch attacks because no one would accept their traffic.As for anti-phishing and malware downloads,there are a number of services that track "bad" sites and warn users off.Users can still go where they want,but at least there are signposts warning that they are entering a dangerous neighborhood.Google does this in its search results,working with StopBadware.org (I am an advisory board member),and both Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft's Internet Explorer offer similar protections.In all cases,adventurous users or professionals can overcome the paternalism,but only by paying what amounts to liability insurance,for the risks they impose on the system.
The point is to create economic incentives to reduce cybercrime.Real criminals won't be deterred,but such a system would prevent the rest of us from being pulled along or becoming victims.With fewer victims,crime will pay less.There are several reasons why this has not yet happened.The first is inertia,combined with (or disguised as) idealism - the mistaken idea that the Internet should be free not just for speech,but also from payment.Yet it costs something to maintain an infrastructure that keeps people safe.Indeed,cost - both to users and to ISPs - is the second obstacle.The challenge is to acknowledge the costs (as we are now doing with pollution) and assign them to people who can - and can be compelled to - pay for them.After all,we accept the costs of police forces and health care,including not just hospitals,but also clean water,safe food,etc.So how do we make this happen?ISPs need to pass these costs on to their customers.But they won't,because they compete mostly on price.So customers need to demand security as part of their service,while ISPs need to shun ISPs that don't comply.
To help things along,someone should file a lawsuit - not too many!- against ISPs who tolerate misbehavior.The targets should be ISPs that willfully serve criminal customers,refusing to deal with complaints to the point that ignorance is no longer a legitimate excuse.

至于垃圾邮件,isp(包括邮寄服务提供商)可能会限制他们的用户来说,每天100封电子邮件.对更多的人而言,你将不得不付出或至少张贴一个安全的债券,或通过一些好的行为测试.与此同时,所有的isp要实施一个电子邮件身份证制...