作业帮为什么这个句子里缺be动词也可以?
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/01 02:08:31
为什么这个句子里缺be动词也可以?
有个原文里的句子：It's currently home to 2,500 people ,all but a handful of them indigenous Inuit.为什么不是“a handful of them are indigenous Inuit”?总感觉原句却了点啥.还有一个类似的句子,也是感觉缺be动词：But these sorts of products are heavy and bulky and the cost of transporting them relatively high.不应该是are relatively high吗?这是英国人写的,应该也没错,
有个原文里的句子：It's currently home to 2,500 people ,all but a handful of them indigenous Inuit.为什么不是“a handful of them are indigenous Inuit”?总感觉原句却了点啥.还有一个类似的句子,也是感觉缺be动词：But these sorts of products are heavy and bulky and the cost of transporting them relatively high.不应该是are relatively high吗?这是英国人写的,应该也没错,
It's currently home to 2,500 people ,all but a handful of them indigenous Inuit.
这一句的后半部分可看成是一个独立结构,也就是them后省略了being(也可改成：and all but a handful of them were indigenous Inuit.
如：
He came into the room,a book under his arm.（后半句可改为and a book was under his arm.
But these sorts of products are heavy and bulky and the cost of transporting them relatively high.
这一句后半句省略了be动词(is).
英语中的第二个单句可以省略谓语（前提是跟第一个单句谓语相同）
相当于：
and the cost of transporting them （is） relatively high.
这一句的后半部分可看成是一个独立结构,也就是them后省略了being(也可改成：and all but a handful of them were indigenous Inuit.
如：
He came into the room,a book under his arm.（后半句可改为and a book was under his arm.
But these sorts of products are heavy and bulky and the cost of transporting them relatively high.
这一句后半句省略了be动词(is).
英语中的第二个单句可以省略谓语（前提是跟第一个单句谓语相同）
相当于：
and the cost of transporting them （is） relatively high.
请问下面句子里hold的这个动词怎么讲,为什么在be动词的位置用一个动词hold,
什么情况下句子里可以省略BE动词?
一个句子里可以有两个be动词吗?
句子里什么时候该有be动词?或者什么时候该出现be动词?为什么有的句子没有be动词?
这个句子中系动词为什么变成be了
一个英文句子里有be动词 那么这个句子中的动词都要加ing吗?
Thanks for your help.这个句子里为什么没有动词?
请问seem作系动词时,主语+seem+to be+表语,这个句子结构里的to be 都可以省略吗?
为什么be动词和行为动词不能在同一个句子里?
The buttons should be easy to reach这个句子里的不定式作什么成分,为什么（可以再举例子
英语：这个句子是什么语法的句子,为什么be动词放在最后
为什么助动词 情态动词 都可以和实意动词出现在一个句子里