作业帮一个具有挑战性朋友的意义 英语作文
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/09 14:45:36
一个具有挑战性朋友的意义 英语作文
The claim mainly expresses that educationhas a responsibility to guide students to a field that will make more money.Asfor me,I will firmly disagree with such a ridiculous view that may greatlymislead current college students.Firstly,the substance of education is notabout creating wealth but promote the development of individual ability.Inaddition,study itself is a process of digesting knowledge,which tends tocreate more value than money.Also,lucrative careers may not be the interestedfields of the students and the competitive pressure could be much higher.
Atfirst,we should be clear about the fact that the substance of education isindividual development.Educational institutions are typical educatingorganizations that commit the function of educating.They are responsible forthe correct guidance of students to achieve their personal promotion withoutdistraction of fame and money.If education fails to support the students tobuild up healthy personal view,they may take it for granted that they have toget used to the society by sacrificing their own interest.The consequence isvery disastrous as they may give up their dreams and lose their variety whenthey grow up.Hence,the social environment could be extremely depressing,sothat crimes take place frequently.To sum up,the function of educationalinstitutions are encouraging students to pursue their dreams instead ofdiscouraging them.
Secondly,we should be noticed that the most valuable product of study is knowledge forsure,but not earning money.If we are forced to go to school only for thedesire for making money,the substantial significance of study is ruined.Studyshould promote the interest of students in specific fields and motivate them toinnovate.And this compulsion is expected to make them devote to their chosencareers,so that wealth is created.Study in a stiff way is highly harmful tothe enthusiasm of students in particular courses and damage their primitiveimpression.Therefore,they might be hard to contribute entirely to theirfuture careers,while social productive efficiency is weaken in this way.Inconclusion,the tutors in educational institutions should rather promote theinterest in study than turning the significant learning process into snobbishlyboring path.
Eventually,the concept of lucrative careers is being more abstract than ever before,because the competence in such careers is increasing and other fields need toattract them by improving their salaries.There is no need in focusing on theincome of particular areas,for the economic environment is able toautomatically adjust the average salary of each individual.The graduates shouldbe promoted to take part in careers that have few employees and are necessaryto enlarge the scale of personnel.They could make contribution to their nationthrough committing more significant jobs instead of choosing soundly lucrativefields.In return,the national organizations will surely reward them with theappropriate amount that they deserve to possess.By the way,the so-calledlucrative careers are majorly conflicted with the interested fields of thestudents.In these circumstances,students are often required to refrain theircreativity in their work,so that the efficiency and effectiveness of companiesare sure to abate.This is a scary loop that the benefit made by theenterprises could subsequently get lower and the general income of eachemployee will then decrease.Therefore,the idea of lucrative careers is only atemporary effective view and should not be well promoted.
Finally,we can conclude that the lucrative careers temporarily exist,and there it isnot necessary to add pressure of making money on the process of study.As ismentioned before,the main goal of learning is developing knowledge,which isthe real motivation of individual growth.Education,especially in theeducational institutions,is obliged to improve students’ interest on studyingparticular courses to emphasize that they are expected to contribute to theirnation.Conclusively,the educational institutions are not encouraged to urgetheir students to follow the general trends of selecting fields associated withcurrent lucrative jobs.My position can be derived from the mentioned contentsand directly proved by the passage written above.
Atfirst,we should be clear about the fact that the substance of education isindividual development.Educational institutions are typical educatingorganizations that commit the function of educating.They are responsible forthe correct guidance of students to achieve their personal promotion withoutdistraction of fame and money.If education fails to support the students tobuild up healthy personal view,they may take it for granted that they have toget used to the society by sacrificing their own interest.The consequence isvery disastrous as they may give up their dreams and lose their variety whenthey grow up.Hence,the social environment could be extremely depressing,sothat crimes take place frequently.To sum up,the function of educationalinstitutions are encouraging students to pursue their dreams instead ofdiscouraging them.
Secondly,we should be noticed that the most valuable product of study is knowledge forsure,but not earning money.If we are forced to go to school only for thedesire for making money,the substantial significance of study is ruined.Studyshould promote the interest of students in specific fields and motivate them toinnovate.And this compulsion is expected to make them devote to their chosencareers,so that wealth is created.Study in a stiff way is highly harmful tothe enthusiasm of students in particular courses and damage their primitiveimpression.Therefore,they might be hard to contribute entirely to theirfuture careers,while social productive efficiency is weaken in this way.Inconclusion,the tutors in educational institutions should rather promote theinterest in study than turning the significant learning process into snobbishlyboring path.
Eventually,the concept of lucrative careers is being more abstract than ever before,because the competence in such careers is increasing and other fields need toattract them by improving their salaries.There is no need in focusing on theincome of particular areas,for the economic environment is able toautomatically adjust the average salary of each individual.The graduates shouldbe promoted to take part in careers that have few employees and are necessaryto enlarge the scale of personnel.They could make contribution to their nationthrough committing more significant jobs instead of choosing soundly lucrativefields.In return,the national organizations will surely reward them with theappropriate amount that they deserve to possess.By the way,the so-calledlucrative careers are majorly conflicted with the interested fields of thestudents.In these circumstances,students are often required to refrain theircreativity in their work,so that the efficiency and effectiveness of companiesare sure to abate.This is a scary loop that the benefit made by theenterprises could subsequently get lower and the general income of eachemployee will then decrease.Therefore,the idea of lucrative careers is only atemporary effective view and should not be well promoted.
Finally,we can conclude that the lucrative careers temporarily exist,and there it isnot necessary to add pressure of making money on the process of study.As ismentioned before,the main goal of learning is developing knowledge,which isthe real motivation of individual growth.Education,especially in theeducational institutions,is obliged to improve students’ interest on studyingparticular courses to emphasize that they are expected to contribute to theirnation.Conclusively,the educational institutions are not encouraged to urgetheir students to follow the general trends of selecting fields associated withcurrent lucrative jobs.My position can be derived from the mentioned contentsand directly proved by the passage written above.