作业帮求翻译,不要机器翻译,要通顺
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/24 03:06:04
求翻译,不要机器翻译,要通顺
Interest is growing in modifying national income accounting systems to pro-mote understanding of the links between economy and environment.
The field of environmental accounting has made great strides in the past two decades, moving from a rather arcane endeavor to one tested in dozens of countries and well established in a few. But the idea that nations might integrate the economic role of the environment into their income accounts is neither a quick sell nor a quick process; it has been under discussion since the 1960s. Despite the difficulties and controversies described in this article, however, interest is growing in modifying national income accounting systems to promote understanding of the links between economy and environment.
Why Change?
Governments around the world develop economic data systems known as national income accounts to calculate macroeconomic indicators such as gross domestic product. Building a nation’s economic use of the environment into such accounts is a response to several perceived flaws in the System of National Accounts (SNA), as defined by the United Nations and used internationally. One flaw in the SNA often cited is that the cost of environmental protection cannot be identified. Consequently, money spent, say, to put pollution control devices on smokestacks increases GDP, even though the expenditure is not economically productive, some argue. These critics call for differentiating “defensive” expenditures from others within the accounts.
Interest is growing in modifying national income accounting systems to pro-mote understanding of the links between economy and environment.
The field of environmental accounting has made great strides in the past two decades, moving from a rather arcane endeavor to one tested in dozens of countries and well established in a few. But the idea that nations might integrate the economic role of the environment into their income accounts is neither a quick sell nor a quick process; it has been under discussion since the 1960s. Despite the difficulties and controversies described in this article, however, interest is growing in modifying national income accounting systems to promote understanding of the links between economy and environment.
Why Change?
Governments around the world develop economic data systems known as national income accounts to calculate macroeconomic indicators such as gross domestic product. Building a nation’s economic use of the environment into such accounts is a response to several perceived flaws in the System of National Accounts (SNA), as defined by the United Nations and used internationally. One flaw in the SNA often cited is that the cost of environmental protection cannot be identified. Consequently, money spent, say, to put pollution control devices on smokestacks increases GDP, even though the expenditure is not economically productive, some argue. These critics call for differentiating “defensive” expenditures from others within the accounts.
兴趣是越来越修改国民收入核算制度,以支持远程理解之间的联系,经济和环境.
在环境会计领域已取得长足在过去二十年里,从一个相当神秘的努力的一个检验在几十个国家和建立在少数.但是这种观点纳入联合国可能的经济作用的环境问题纳入其收入帐户既不是一个快速销售,也不是一个快速过程;它一直在讨论20世纪60年代以来.尽管有困难和争议本文中描述的,然而,越来越多的兴趣改变国民收入核算系统,以促进理解之间的联系,经济和环境.
为什么要改变?
世界各国政府发展经济的数据系统称为国民收入账户计算的宏观经济指标,如国内生产总值.建设一个国家的经济环境中使用的这种账户是针对一些知觉缺陷的国民核算体系（系统网络体系）的规定,由联合国和国际上使用.一个在国民核算体系的缺陷经常提到的是,保护环境的费用无法确定.因此,资金,也就是说,把污染控制设备的烟囱增加国内生产总值,即使没有经济上的支出是生产性,有些人认为.这些批评者呼吁分化“防御型”的其他支出的帐户.
在环境会计领域已取得长足在过去二十年里,从一个相当神秘的努力的一个检验在几十个国家和建立在少数.但是这种观点纳入联合国可能的经济作用的环境问题纳入其收入帐户既不是一个快速销售,也不是一个快速过程;它一直在讨论20世纪60年代以来.尽管有困难和争议本文中描述的,然而,越来越多的兴趣改变国民收入核算系统,以促进理解之间的联系,经济和环境.
为什么要改变?
世界各国政府发展经济的数据系统称为国民收入账户计算的宏观经济指标,如国内生产总值.建设一个国家的经济环境中使用的这种账户是针对一些知觉缺陷的国民核算体系（系统网络体系）的规定,由联合国和国际上使用.一个在国民核算体系的缺陷经常提到的是,保护环境的费用无法确定.因此,资金,也就是说,把污染控制设备的烟囱增加国内生产总值,即使没有经济上的支出是生产性,有些人认为.这些批评者呼吁分化“防御型”的其他支出的帐户.