作业帮新GRE阅读逻辑10套里面的逻辑题目求翻译求解释
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/12 16:20:16
新GRE阅读逻辑10套里面的逻辑题目求翻译求解释
Each of two particular inspection systems that are based on different principles would detect all product flaws but would also erroneously reject three percent of flawless products．Assuming there is no overlap between the products erroneously rejected by the two systems and also no interference between the systems if both operate, using both systems and rejecting only those products found flawed by both would be a way of avoiding all erroneous rejections．
Which of the following most precisely characterizes the reasoning in the argument?
(A)The reasoning is conclusive, that is, the conclusion cannot be false if the statements offered in its support are true．
(B)The reasoning is strong but not conclusive, if the statements offered in support of the conclusion are true, they provide good grounds for that conclu- sion, though it is possible that additional infor- mation might weaken the argument．
(C)The reasoning is weak; the statements offered in support of the conclusion, though relevant to it, by themselves provide at best inadequate grounds for the conclusion．
(D)The reasoning is flawed in that the conclusion is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of evidence offered in its support．
(E)The reasoning is flawed in that the argument treats evidence that a factor is necessary to bring about an event as if it were evidence that the factor is sufficient to bring about that event．
Each of two particular inspection systems that are based on different principles would detect all product flaws but would also erroneously reject three percent of flawless products．Assuming there is no overlap between the products erroneously rejected by the two systems and also no interference between the systems if both operate, using both systems and rejecting only those products found flawed by both would be a way of avoiding all erroneous rejections．
Which of the following most precisely characterizes the reasoning in the argument?
(A)The reasoning is conclusive, that is, the conclusion cannot be false if the statements offered in its support are true．
(B)The reasoning is strong but not conclusive, if the statements offered in support of the conclusion are true, they provide good grounds for that conclu- sion, though it is possible that additional infor- mation might weaken the argument．
(C)The reasoning is weak; the statements offered in support of the conclusion, though relevant to it, by themselves provide at best inadequate grounds for the conclusion．
(D)The reasoning is flawed in that the conclusion is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of evidence offered in its support．
(E)The reasoning is flawed in that the argument treats evidence that a factor is necessary to bring about an event as if it were evidence that the factor is sufficient to bring about that event．
晕= = ,我一看到新版GRE就知道又是你.虽然我以后要考的是GMAT.不过话说你们GRE的词汇量相当大啊,1.8万吧.
———————————————————————————————————————————
现在有两种产品检查系统,而且是基于不同的原理制成的.它们都能检查出所有的存在缺陷的产品,但同时也有百分之三的合格产品被当做缺陷产品而被驳回（即被误认为缺陷产品）.
假设在两种产品检测系统在检测出的缺陷产品不发生重叠（就是比如A系统检测出了1号产品有问题,到B系统检测时就已经算做A检测出来了,在统计缺陷产品时,不会出现2个1号产品有缺陷的数据）并且两系统不会相互干扰的情况下,用两种检测系统一起检测,是一种能只检测出有缺陷产品而避免将合格产品误认为缺陷产品的方法.
以下的哪个选项能够最精确的描述以上论据的原因.
（A）原因是拥有确定性,即如果所支持的检测报告是正确的话结论就不可能有错.
——————————————————————————————————————————
我翻译到A选项就翻译不下去了,因为看到了"conclusive","strong","weak"这几个词,我没学过GRE所以不知道这三个词在这道题中的特殊含义是什么.
但是如果你知道这几个选项的意思就好办了,因为我已经明白了.原文之所以产生以上论据的原因是：假如总共有100个产品并都按顺序标了序号,
其中A系统检测出来的缺陷产品号码为1,2,3,98,99,100 ；
B系统检测出来的缺陷产品号码为4,5,6,98,99,100 ；
那通过以上数据就可知道真正的缺陷产品是98,99,100
如果出现系统出错重叠比如A：1,2,3,98,99,100 B：3,4,5,98,99,100
那么再重新检测一遍即可.
这就是保证不会出错的方法.
真的很抱歉没能给您全部翻译下来,还是功夫不到家.
再问： 惭愧惭愧，貌似知道上面没什么人问GRE逻辑，我自己做的都特别羞愧，非常感谢了，我做这个逻辑做的特别头晕啊。这道题的E选项，不太明白他在说什么。
再答： 实在很抱歉啊 想了半天 问了好多身边的人 终究最后一个选项还是没有翻译出来 不过我现在已经开始主动接触GRE的相关资料了 以后有什么问题还可以来找我 咱俩一起研究！
再问： 好的。由于新G没什么特别多的资料，我最近在做老G的大白本的NO.4-NO.9的题目，其中数学部分有很多答案是错误的，想问下你有在做吗？有勘误表吗？我在网上没有搜到。
———————————————————————————————————————————
现在有两种产品检查系统,而且是基于不同的原理制成的.它们都能检查出所有的存在缺陷的产品,但同时也有百分之三的合格产品被当做缺陷产品而被驳回（即被误认为缺陷产品）.
假设在两种产品检测系统在检测出的缺陷产品不发生重叠（就是比如A系统检测出了1号产品有问题,到B系统检测时就已经算做A检测出来了,在统计缺陷产品时,不会出现2个1号产品有缺陷的数据）并且两系统不会相互干扰的情况下,用两种检测系统一起检测,是一种能只检测出有缺陷产品而避免将合格产品误认为缺陷产品的方法.
以下的哪个选项能够最精确的描述以上论据的原因.
（A）原因是拥有确定性,即如果所支持的检测报告是正确的话结论就不可能有错.
——————————————————————————————————————————
我翻译到A选项就翻译不下去了,因为看到了"conclusive","strong","weak"这几个词,我没学过GRE所以不知道这三个词在这道题中的特殊含义是什么.
但是如果你知道这几个选项的意思就好办了,因为我已经明白了.原文之所以产生以上论据的原因是：假如总共有100个产品并都按顺序标了序号,
其中A系统检测出来的缺陷产品号码为1,2,3,98,99,100 ；
B系统检测出来的缺陷产品号码为4,5,6,98,99,100 ；
那通过以上数据就可知道真正的缺陷产品是98,99,100
如果出现系统出错重叠比如A：1,2,3,98,99,100 B：3,4,5,98,99,100
那么再重新检测一遍即可.
这就是保证不会出错的方法.
真的很抱歉没能给您全部翻译下来,还是功夫不到家.
再问： 惭愧惭愧，貌似知道上面没什么人问GRE逻辑，我自己做的都特别羞愧，非常感谢了，我做这个逻辑做的特别头晕啊。这道题的E选项，不太明白他在说什么。
再答： 实在很抱歉啊 想了半天 问了好多身边的人 终究最后一个选项还是没有翻译出来 不过我现在已经开始主动接触GRE的相关资料了 以后有什么问题还可以来找我 咱俩一起研究！
再问： 好的。由于新G没什么特别多的资料，我最近在做老G的大白本的NO.4-NO.9的题目，其中数学部分有很多答案是错误的，想问下你有在做吗？有勘误表吗？我在网上没有搜到。