英语翻译Certainly,I had little in the way of a plan.So the first

英语翻译
Certainly,I had little in the way of a plan.So the first thing I did was to explore the range of what was possible.We know that workmen often change their manner of working when they change their tools.This is what I found too.After exploring the interface,and trying out the various filters one by one,then undoing their action,I was able to learn enough on-line – to learn enough just-in-time – to formulate an achievable goal and a plausible plan for attaining it.My goal was never fully articulated before I understood how I might achieve it.
How can a decision cycle model explain this form of cycling between exploring what can be done and deciding what one’s goals ought to be?In the decision cycle account,both the goals of the agent and his action repertoire are always well defined.We are supposed to know in advance what we wantto achieve,and what we can do.It is the job of a good interface to make these possible actions visible.In rare instances where we don’t know what we can do,we may have to probe the environment.But then the meaning of the available commands or icons is supposed to be evident.Information hunting expeditions of the sort I undertook in Photoshop are impossible to explain in a decision cycle account because their purpose is not just to discover the full range of actions that are available,they are also supposed to teach what those actions mean – the state transformation the actions produce.
It is not likely that any simple augmentation of the decision cycle can accommodate the need to oscillate between discovering what can be done and choosing a goal.Agents are assumed to have advance knowledge of their goals.They either know what the environment looks like when the goal state is achieved (as in tic tac toe),or they have an operational test for deciding whether a particular state qualifies as a goal state.Both requirements are unrealistic.Consider my effort at creating a figure again.Did I have clear and distinct mental image of the final figure I hoped to create?No.My understanding of how images can be transformed was too impoverished to be able to visualize what I wanted.Did I have an operational test of adequacy?
Again I think not.I didn’t have an absolute test of adequacy3 because I didn’t really know the kind of figure I might hope for.I didn’t have a relative test of adequacy4 which indicated when a figure was good enough,because as I learned more about what was possible I learned more about what I would accept.I was developing a metric of goodness as I went along.

当然,我很少在方式的计划.因此,第一件事,我本来是探讨的范围是什么可能的.我们知道,工人常常改变他们的工作方式,当他们改变他们的工具.这是我发现过.之后,探索界面,并尝试各种过滤器,一个又一个,然后打倒他们的行动,我是能够学习掌握足够的上线-要了解不够,刚刚在-时间-制定一个可实现的目标和可行的计划,为实现它.我的目标是永远不能完全阐明之前,我懂得我可能会实现这一目标.
又如何能决定周期模型解释,这种形式的自行车之间的探索可以做些什么,以及决定什么人的目标应该是什么?在决定周期的帐户,这两个目标的代理人和他的行动的曲目都是好defined.we是为了预先知道什么我们wantto实现,和我们所能做的.它是就业,一个良好的界面,使这些可能采取的行动可见.在罕见的情况下,我们不知道我们所能做的,我们可能要探讨的环境.但当时的含义可用命令或图标应该是显而易见的.资料狩猎探险的排序我承诺在Photoshop中是无法解释的一项决定中周期的帐户,因为他们的目的不只是发现了全方位的行动的情况下,他们也假定,教导这些行动是什么意思-国家转型行动产生.这是不太可能的任何简单隆乳的决定,周期可以容纳需要振荡之间的发现可以做些什么,并选择一个目标.代理商被假定为有先进知识,他们的目标.他们或者知道什么环境看起来像时,国家的目标是实现（如在香港旅游业议会交谘会趾） ,或他们有业务的测试,决定是否某一特定国家有资格作为一个国家的目标.双方的要求是不现实的.考虑我的努力,创造一个数字.我有明确的和独特的精神的形象,最后的数字我希望能创造呢?号我的理解,如何图像可以转化为过于贫困,以便能够可视化我想.当时我有一个业务的测试是否足够?
再次,我认为没有.我没有一个绝对的考验,adequacy3 ,因为我没有真正了解什么样的数字,我可能希望.我没有一个相对的试验adequacy4显示,当一个数字是不够好,因为我学到更多关于什么是可能的,我知道更多关于我是会接受的.我是发展中国家的一度量的善,正如我到沿.