作业帮英语翻译Both cases raised the issue of whether government regula
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/26 05:37:08
英语翻译
Both cases raised the issue of whether government regulation went so far that it was not only invalid but that damages should be paid to the complainant as well—a “talking.” In Penn Central the railroad alleged that the Landmarks Law of New York City that denied it the right to erect a 55-story office building over the Grand Central Station at 42nd Street and Park Avenue involved a “taking” under the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments of the U.S.Constitution.In his opinion,Brennan addressed this problem and conceded that it was too difficult for the Court to develop any “set formula” for what constituted a “taking.” Consequently,while the Fifth Amendment (Just Compensation Clause) is “designed to bar government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens [that],in all fairness and justice,should be borne by the public as a whole,” the determination (of when fairness and justice dictates such action) is made “upon the particular circumstances of the case,” based on an ad hoc factual inquiry.
Both cases raised the issue of whether government regulation went so far that it was not only invalid but that damages should be paid to the complainant as well—a “talking.” In Penn Central the railroad alleged that the Landmarks Law of New York City that denied it the right to erect a 55-story office building over the Grand Central Station at 42nd Street and Park Avenue involved a “taking” under the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments of the U.S.Constitution.In his opinion,Brennan addressed this problem and conceded that it was too difficult for the Court to develop any “set formula” for what constituted a “taking.” Consequently,while the Fifth Amendment (Just Compensation Clause) is “designed to bar government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens [that],in all fairness and justice,should be borne by the public as a whole,” the determination (of when fairness and justice dictates such action) is made “upon the particular circumstances of the case,” based on an ad hoc factual inquiry.
两件案件同时引出一项争议,那就是是否政府法规太过分以致不仅无效而且应该给原告赔偿损害.在penn 中央法院,铁路方主张《纽约城市地表法》否认一项权利.这项权利就是在42街的大中央车站与公园大道上建造一幢55层办公大楼牵涉到美国宪法修正案第五条与第十四条相关权利的采用.根据铁路方的意见,brennan 提出这个问题并且认为法院很难为“采用相关宪法权利”而发展处一套程式是合理的!虽然第五宪法修正案（仅仅就是赔偿条款）阻止政府强迫一些人单独承受公共负担,根据公平与正义法则,这些负担应该由作为一个整体的公众来承担,但最终判决（这样的判决是公平与正义法则强行规定的!)的做出是一句案件特定的背景,即是依据专案的事实调查!
这两种情况下提出了这个问题的政府管制是否去那么远,它不仅是无效的,但应注意损害赔偿原告作为well-a”说话.“在潘中央铁路指称地标规律的纽约否认是正确的55-story办公大楼建造在中央火车站42nd街道和公园大道在涉及一个“以“在第五,美国宪法第十四修正案.在他看来,陶片和承认,处理了这个问题太难了,法院在发展任何“计算公式什么构成了一个“以.“因此,而第五修正案(公正的补偿条款)是“设计”的政府禁止迫使一些人承担公共负担:[],在所有的公平和正义,应由公众作为一个整体,”的确定的公平和正义命令时,这样的行动)“在特殊情况下的情况下,“以一个专案事实的询价,则甚为感谢.
这两种情况下提出了这个问题的政府管制是否去那么远,它不仅是无效的,但应注意损害赔偿原告作为well-a”说话.“在潘中央铁路指称地标规律的纽约否认是正确的55-story办公大楼建造在中央火车站42nd街道和公园大道在涉及一个“以“在第五,美国宪法第十四修正案.在他看来,陶片和承认,处理了这个问题太难了,法院在发展任何“计算公式什么构成了一个“以.“因此,而第五修正案(公正的补偿条款)是“设计”的政府禁止迫使一些人承担公共负担:[],在所有的公平和正义,应由公众作为一个整体,”的确定的公平和正义命令时,这样的行动)“在特殊情况下的情况下,“以一个专案事实的询价,则甚为感谢.
英语翻译whether the government should increase the financing of
英语翻译This mix of powers has raised the issue many times in hi
英语翻译In both cases,the stressed participants remembered the r
英语翻译Government had took actions against the issue which daze
It has raised the question of whether it is a breach of anim
He raised the question of whether we could find the necessar
英语翻译A.To play the role of government functionsOur government
英语翻译With the exception of cases specifically mentioned in th
这篇雅思作文得几分There is a issue of whether increasing the number o
the issue of whether people should go abroad is ...这句话语法对吗?i
这句英语语法是否正确When it comes to the issue of whether to go sights
英语翻译it is whether the issue and the target is politically co