谁能帮我paraphrase一下啊?

谁能帮我paraphrase一下啊?
就是随便paraphrase For a long time,philosophers have been arguing whether vagueness exists in the real world or is just a problem of semantics.Disputes over vagueness here,however,result from a language problem of trying to refer to an object as having an absolute value when in fact the object has a continuous range of values.In a paper published in 1923,the British philosopher Bertrand Russell ( ‘Vagueness’,Australian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy,1923:84-92 ) initiated his study of vagueness as a philosophical topic in its own right,rather than simply as something to be cleared out of the way before serious work could begin.But Russell thought that the principle of his logic were perfectly correct only as applied to perfectly precise language.Moreover,he also held that we can never attain perfect precision; we can only imagine it.
In fact,vagueness is a prevalent phenomenon in relationship between the language and situation it relates to,consider the nature of relationship between language and the world it describes in most general aspects.Therefore,in the sense of being able to describe all of human being’s experience,even language itself must imcorporate the built-in flexibility to some extent.This flexibility resides,in part,in its capacity for vagueness (Channel 2000:201).To quote Channel (ibid.:5 ),“Interest in vagueness in language use and meaning has arisen in a number of discipline :literary criticism ,linguistics,psychology,philosophy.Much of it suggests that vagueness is present in a great deal of language use,and that therefore a complete theory of language must have vagueness as an integral component.” That is,vagueness is an essential property of any natural language,not an accidental difference between two languages.As a result,when two different vague system are put in contrast,a lot more differences between the two languages become apparent.In this way,language cannot help but incorporate the attribute of vagueness.

我是看完一边自己总结翻译的,不但英语绕,汉语更绕,这属于哲学问题,们来就很绕,讲究的看吧.
很长时间以来,哲学思想被人们争论它是真是存在的,还只是一种语义上的问题.然而,令人模糊不清的地方在,它是否是因为语言上的问题而被赋予真实存在的形式.在一篇1923年英国哲学家罗素发表的论文上,他以模糊哲学为话题开始研究,并取得了独立研究权,在开始认真研究前他放弃了简单的研究方法.罗素认为,他的原则是,完全正确的逻辑只适用于完全准确的语言.此外,他还说我们不能达到完全准确,我们只能想象.
实际上,”模糊“是一种普遍存在的现象在语言和现实情景的关系里,并且在语言和世界的关系里包含了大多数方面.因此,在某种意义上是能够描述所有的人的经历,甚至语言本身必须灵活,在一定程度上,这种灵活性的存在,部分在我们所说的“模糊”里面.在我们用语言的时候这种“模糊”已被我们在批评性文学,语言学,心理学,哲学中大量的训练过,.大部分研究表明,模糊被我们大大量的使用,因此一个完整的理论,语言必须有含糊不清的部分.也就是说,模糊是一种自然形成的语言,而不是因为说话偶然间形成的.因此,当这个人说话时两个不同的“模糊”系统出现,那么将会出现更大的不同.总而言之,语言不能不归咎在“模糊”上.