作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

英语翻译3.6.Evaluations and comparisonsIn order to compare vario

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/05/17 09:32:49
英语翻译
3.6.Evaluations and comparisons
In order to compare various models of the prediction error,this
article by MAPE measure in-sample and out-of-sample data
accuracy of the forecast,and the results are shown in Table 4.
The in-sample data are used to establish the grey forecasting model.
The out-of-sample data are used to evaluate the forecasting
performance.
Table 4 shows that GM(1,1),GM(1,6),AGAGM(1,6) and
GAGM(1,6) in the in-sample (1993–2003) of the MAPE values are
0.146,0.2875,0.2378 and 0.2009,respectively.
With regards to the out-of sample (2004–2005) results of the
forecast,GM(1,1),GM(1,6),AGAGM(1,6) and GAGM(1,6) MAPE values
are 0.0828,0.0804,0.0464 and 0.0076,respectively.
Considering all the empirical results for out-of-sample,the
GAGM(1,6) model had the smallest MAPE (0.76%) with an excellent
forecasting power (Lewis,1982).Witt and Witt (1992) and Law
(2000) mentioned that the MAPE value (0.76%) is very low,with
excellent forecast accuracy.In other words,this article proposed
that AGAGM(1,6) and GAGM(1,6) can effectively improve the original
grey model forecast accuracy.
3.6.评价和比较为了比较各种模型的预测误差,这本文的结果措施的样本和样本数据预测的准确性,和的结果见表4.使用的样本数据建立的灰色预测模型.样本外数据是用来评估预测性能.表4显示,通用汽车(1 ,1),通用汽车(1 ,6),agagm(不知)(1)和伽格美(1 ,6)的样本(1993–2003)的平均相对误差值0.146,0.2875,0.2378和0.2009,分别为.至于外的样本(2004–2005)结果的预测,通用汽车(1 ,1),通用汽车(1 ,6),agagm(1 ,6)和伽格美(1 ,6)结果值0.0828,0.0804,0.0464和0.0076,分别为.考虑到所有的研究样本,这伽格美(1)模型有最小的结果(0.76%)与一个很好的预测能力(路易斯,1982).维特,维特(1992)和法(2000)提到,平均相对误差值(0.76%)很低,与良好的预测精度.换句话说,本文提出这agagm(1 ,6)和伽格美(1 ,6)可以有效地提高原灰色模型的预测精度.