英语翻译We conducted regression techniques to assess if there we

英语翻译
We conducted regression techniques to assess if there were a significant interaction term for the effectiveness of active job search on starting wages (see Table 3).In Model 1,we first entered the country labor market.There were significant wage differences between samples and this variable alone accounted for 75% of the variance in wages.This could minimize the effects of the control variables.In Model 2,we then entered the control variables of age,gender,GPA and preparatory job search.Together,these variables explained an additional 3% of the variance with GPA,gender and preparatory job search being significant in the expected directions.In Model 3,we entered active job search which was significant (b¼.12,po.01) and explained an additional 1% of the variance.It confirms that active job search is positively related to starting wage,after taking into consideration those students’ demographic variables as well as their preparatory job search efforts.Finally,in model 4,we entered the interaction term,which was statistically significant (b¼.59,po.05; DR2¼.01; DF¼5.38; po.05).Such interaction result indicates that the positive influence of job search activities on starting wages would be decreased in China (with the dummy variable Source equal to 2) than in the United States (Source equal to 1).Even though the job applicants in China are diligent to involve themselves in the job search activities,their efforts are not so effective as compared with those US students.It supports hypothesis 3 that active job search is less significant in predicting initial salary in China than in the United States.This could possibly be due to the lack of job-related information in the Chinese job market.
As supplemental analysis,we analyzed the regression result separately for China and the United States.Only grade point average predicted wages in China,whereas gender,GPA,and active job search all influenced starting wages in the United States.
6.Discussion
In summary,the findings of this research suggest that job seekers’ job search practices varied between China and the United States and the degree of aggressive recruitment may be an underlying a factor in these differences.The findings suggest that preparatory job search is used less in China than in the United States and that active job search is used similarly in the United States compared with in China.The findings also support the assumption that active job search is likely to be less effective in developing labor markets than in developed labor markets.

我们进行了回归分析方法评估如果有一个显著的交互术语有效性的积极寻找工作的起薪上(见表3).模型1中,我们首先进入该国的劳动力市场.工资差异有显著样品和这个变量独自占据了75%的方差在工资.这可以减少控制变量的影响.在Model 2,然后我们进入控制变量的年龄,性别,平均成绩和筹备工作搜索.在一起,这些变量解释了一个额外的3%的面相与GPA、性别和筹备工作搜索重要在预期的方向.在模型3,我们进入了积极的工作搜索,这是很重要的(b¼..12日,po.01)并解释了一个额外的1%的方差.它证实了积极找工作起薪呈正相关,在考虑这些学生的人口统计学变量以及它们的筹备工作搜索的努力.最后,在模型4,我们进入了交互词,有统计学意义 (b¼.59, po.05; DR2¼.01; DF¼5.38; po.05).结果表明,这种交互的积极影响的求职活动对的起薪会减少在中国(含虚拟变量的来源等于2)比在美国(源等于1).尽管在中国的求职者是勤奋工作的人沉溺于搜索活动,他们的努力并不是那么有效,与对照组比较美国的学生.它支持假设3,积极找工作是不太重要的预测初始工资在中国比在美国.这可能是由于缺乏相关信息在中国的就业市场.
作为补充的分析,我们分析了回归结果分别为中国和美国.只有平均成绩预测中国的工资水平,而性别、GPA,积极的工作搜索所有影响美国的起薪.
6.讨论
总之,这篇研究的结果表明,求职者的求职实践不同的中国和美国之间的积极发展的程度可能是一个重要的因素在这些差异.研究结果表明,筹备工作搜索用得少在中国比在美国找工作,积极采用类似于美国与中国相比.这些发现也支持这个假设,积极的工作搜索就可能不再有效发展的劳动力市场比发达的劳动力市场.
记得采纳啊 亲~
再问： 好像是用软件翻译的呀，亲
再答： 用人工翻译的
再问： 软件翻译的也无所谓，最重要是要通顺，呵呵，谢啦